From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "durgadoss.r-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<durgadoss.r-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
<rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Matthew Longnecker
<MLongnecker-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org"
<khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [RFC PATCH 2/9] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:00:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51234D59.4060405@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130219033144.GA25610-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
On 02/19/2013 11:31 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 07:30:24PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> Split set&show temp codes as common functions, so we can use it directly when
>> implement linux thermal framework.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> index 863412a..caf01b0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> @@ -702,29 +702,35 @@ static u16 temp_to_u16_adt7461(struct lm90_data *data, long val)
>> * Sysfs stuff
>> */
>>
>> -static ssize_t show_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> - char *buf)
>> +static void _show_temp8(struct device *dev, int index, int *temp)
>
> Why do the new functions not simply return the value ?
> Void return and returning the value in a pointer doesn't make much sense to me.
Yes, you are right, it's better to return value simply.
I will change it in my next version.
Wei.
>
> Guenter
>
>> {
>> - struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>> - int temp;
>>
>> if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> - temp = temp_from_u8_adt7461(data, data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> + *temp = temp_from_u8_adt7461(data, data->temp8[index]);
>> else if (data->kind == max6646)
>> - temp = temp_from_u8(data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> + *temp = temp_from_u8(data->temp8[index]);
>> else
>> - temp = temp_from_s8(data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> + *temp = temp_from_s8(data->temp8[index]);
>>
>> /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> - if (data->kind == lm99 && attr->index == 3)
>> - temp += 16000;
>> + if (data->kind == lm99 && index == 3)
>> + *temp += 16000;
>> +
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> + int temp;
>> +
>> + _show_temp8(dev, attr->index, &temp);
>>
>> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", temp);
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> - const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +static void _set_temp8(struct device *dev, int index, long val)
>> {
>> static const u8 reg[8] = {
>> LM90_REG_W_LOCAL_LOW,
>> @@ -737,60 +743,73 @@ static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> MAX6659_REG_W_REMOTE_EMERG,
>> };
>>
>> - struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> - int nr = attr->index;
>> - long val;
>> - int err;
>> -
>> - err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> - if (err < 0)
>> - return err;
>>
>> /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> - if (data->kind == lm99 && attr->index == 3)
>> + if (data->kind == lm99 && index == 3)
>> val -= 16000;
>>
>> mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> - data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_u8_adt7461(data, val);
>> + data->temp8[index] = temp_to_u8_adt7461(data, val);
>> else if (data->kind == max6646)
>> - data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_u8(val);
>> + data->temp8[index] = temp_to_u8(val);
>> else
>> - data->temp8[nr] = temp_to_s8(val);
>> + data->temp8[index] = temp_to_s8(val);
>>
>> - lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, nr >= 6);
>> - i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg[nr], data->temp8[nr]);
>> + lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, index >= 6);
>> + i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg[index], data->temp8[index]);
>> lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t set_temp8(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + struct sensor_device_attribute *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr);
>> + int index = attr->index;
>> + long val;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + _set_temp8(dev, index, val);
>> +
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t show_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> - char *buf)
>> +static void _show_temp11(struct device *dev, int index, int *temp)
>> {
>> - struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>> - int temp;
>>
>> if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> - temp = temp_from_u16_adt7461(data, data->temp11[attr->index]);
>> + *temp = temp_from_u16_adt7461(data, data->temp11[index]);
>> else if (data->kind == max6646)
>> - temp = temp_from_u16(data->temp11[attr->index]);
>> + *temp = temp_from_u16(data->temp11[index]);
>> else
>> - temp = temp_from_s16(data->temp11[attr->index]);
>> + *temp = temp_from_s16(data->temp11[index]);
>>
>> /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> - if (data->kind == lm99 && attr->index <= 2)
>> - temp += 16000;
>> + if (data->kind == lm99 && index <= 2)
>> + *temp += 16000;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t show_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> + int temp;
>> +
>> + _show_temp11(dev, attr->index, &temp);
>>
>> return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", temp);
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> - const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +static void _set_temp11(struct device *dev, int nr, int index, long val)
>> {
>> struct {
>> u8 high;
>> @@ -804,17 +823,8 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> { LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHH, LM90_REG_W_REMOTE_HIGHL, 1 }
>> };
>>
>> - struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
>> struct lm90_data *data = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>> - int nr = attr->nr;
>> - int index = attr->index;
>> - long val;
>> - int err;
>> -
>> - err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> - if (err < 0)
>> - return err;
>>
>> /* +16 degrees offset for temp2 for the LM99 */
>> if (data->kind == lm99 && index <= 2)
>> @@ -839,6 +849,23 @@ static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> lm90_select_remote_channel(client, data, 0);
>>
>> mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static ssize_t set_temp11(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *devattr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> +{
>> + struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *attr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(devattr);
>> + int nr = attr->nr;
>> + int index = attr->index;
>> + long val;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + err = kstrtol(buf, 10, &val);
>> + if (err < 0)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + _set_temp11(dev, nr, index, val);
>> +
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lm-sensors mailing list
>> lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org
>> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-18 11:30 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Support for tegra30 thermal Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] hwmon: (lm90) split set&show temp as common codes Wei Ni
2013-02-18 22:29 ` Matthew Longnecker
2013-02-19 9:48 ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 3:31 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20130219033144.GA25610-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 10:00 ` Wei Ni [this message]
2013-02-19 22:56 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <51240331.7080604-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-20 12:31 ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] hwmon: (lm90) use macros for the indexes of temp8 and temp11 Wei Ni
2013-02-19 5:39 ` Alex Courbot
[not found] ` <5123100A.9050604-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 9:58 ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:02 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <51240497.8010909-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-20 10:29 ` Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1361187031-3679-1-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] ARM: dt: t30 cardhu: add dt entry for lm90 Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1361187031-3679-2-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 3:28 ` Alex Courbot
2013-02-19 9:52 ` Wei Ni
[not found] ` <5122F162.9030103-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 22:48 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle irq Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1361187031-3679-4-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 3:34 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-02-19 10:43 ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:00 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 3:27 ` Alex Courbot
[not found] ` <5124429B.2000404-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-20 10:27 ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] Thermal: Support using dt node to get sensor Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1361187031-3679-6-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 23:12 ` Stephen Warren
[not found] ` <512406F0.4080708-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-20 10:36 ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] hwmon: (lm90) Register to the thermal framework Wei Ni
2013-02-19 3:42 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20130219034205.GC25610-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 10:47 ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 5:22 ` Alex Courbot
2013-02-19 10:58 ` Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1361187031-3679-7-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 23:18 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 10:40 ` Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] ARM: dt: t30 cardhu: add dt entry for thermal driver Wei Ni
2013-02-19 3:42 ` Alex Courbot
2013-02-19 9:56 ` Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1361187031-3679-9-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-19 23:28 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 11:53 ` Wei Ni
[not found] ` <5124B934.3020900-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-20 17:18 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] ARM: tegra: defconfig: enable thermal framework Wei Ni
2013-02-18 11:30 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] thermal: tegra30: add tegra30 thermal driver Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:48 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-20 12:23 ` Wei Ni
2013-02-19 23:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
[not found] ` <20130219235629.GU17833-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-20 12:29 ` Wei Ni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51234D59.4060405@nvidia.com \
--to=wni-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=MLongnecker-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=durgadoss.r-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rui.zhang-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).