From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Prashant Gaikwad Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] Tegra114 clockframework Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:28:19 +0530 Message-ID: <512619EB.4030103@nvidia.com> References: <1360931849-7090-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <5123C6E7.9070407@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5123C6E7.9070407@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Peter De Schrijver , Mike Turquette , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , Russell King , Simon Glass , Joseph Lo , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 20 February 2013 12:09 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 02/15/2013 05:36 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: >> This is the seventh version of the Tegra114 clockframework. It is based on the >> for-next branch of >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/swarren/linux-tegra.git and >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html. > Mike, > > I think it'd be prudent to take this series through the Tegra tree again > for 3.10; patch 11 needs to go in as part of the series due to internal > dependencies, and I'm slightly worried that other Tegra DT changes might > conflict with that patch (if only for context). Taking this series (and > any other Tegra clk driver changes for 3.10) through the Tegra tree > could resolve that easily. Do you have a problem with that? > > If that's OK, can you stage the dependency Peter mentioned: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html > into a stable branch for me to merge, obviously after 3.9-rc1 is out. > > Thanks. > > Prashant, could you provide a review/ack for this series too. For the series Reviewed-by: Prashant Gaikwad