devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for lm3697 driver
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 20:27:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5127d46f-2d43-41e8-dde0-5ee42a9d47bb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20d9ea9e-bbb8-2240-97cc-615e3fbcef8c@ti.com>

Dan,

On 09/10/2018 09:51 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Jacek
> 
> On 09/10/2018 02:07 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>> Dan, Pavel,
>>
>> On 09/10/2018 04:37 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> Jacek
>>>
>>> On 09/08/2018 02:53 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>> Dan,
>>>>
>>>> On 09/07/2018 03:52 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And I think Jacek pointed out that the bindings references in this bindings
>>>>>>> don't even exist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am thinking we need to deprecate this MFD driver and consolidate these drivers
>>>>>>> in the LED directory as we indicated before.  I did not find any ti-lmu support
>>>>>>> code.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ti-lmu common core code and then the LED children appending the feature differentiation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Need some maintainer weigh in here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hehe. I'm maintnainer. Fun.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know.  I want to see if there was any other opinion.  Especially for the LED driver.
>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> I have a question - is this lm3697 LED controller a cell of some MFD
>>>> device? Or is it a self-contained chip?
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is a self contained chip.  And the LM3697 only function is a LED driver.
>>> It does not have any other special functions like the LM363X drivers for GPIO and Regulator support.
>>
>> This is an argument for merging it as a standalone LED class driver
>> then. It is even more justifiable, taking into account uncertainties
>> related to the proper way of adding the support for it to the existing
>> MFD driver, whereas the code reuse would be the only advantage of having
>> thus support in MFD subsystem.
>>
> 
> Does the argument carry over to the other devices?

If we want to be consequent - yes.

> Like the LM3632 (part of the ti-lmu) has flash and torch and no other special functions
> so it would look like the lm3601x family with different register mappings.

Yes, this is obvious candidate for LED class flash driver.

> The LM3631 seems to also be just a LED driver with no extra functionality
> 
> I could go buy an EVM and put together a driver for that device as well using the lm3601x as
> reference.

I'm not going to encourage you to make this expense, but to put it
politically - I'd happily welcome those drivers in the LED subsystem ;-)

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-11 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-06 13:50 [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for lm3697 driver Dan Murphy
2018-09-06 13:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] leds: lm3697: Introduce the " Dan Murphy
2018-09-06 21:16 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: Add bindings for " Pavel Machek
2018-09-07 13:20   ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-07 13:32     ` Pavel Machek
2018-09-07 13:52       ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-08 19:53         ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-09-10 14:37           ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-10 19:07             ` Jacek Anaszewski
2018-09-10 19:51               ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-11 18:27                 ` Jacek Anaszewski [this message]
2018-09-11 18:37                   ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-11 20:55                 ` Pavel Machek
2018-09-11 21:05                   ` Dan Murphy
2018-09-10 15:41           ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5127d46f-2d43-41e8-dde0-5ee42a9d47bb@gmail.com \
    --to=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmurphy@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).