From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] leds: Add support for Palmas LEDs
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:36:13 -0700
Message-ID: <512FA39D.2060005@wwwdotorg.org>
References: <1362064909-634-1-git-send-email-ian@slimlogic.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <1362064909-634-1-git-send-email-ian@slimlogic.co.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Ian Lartey <ian@slimlogic.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, ldewangan@nvidia.com, j-keerthy@ti.com, gg@slimlogic.co.uk, cooloney@gmail.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, rob.herring@calxeda.com, sameo@linux.intel.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On 02/28/2013 08:21 AM, Ian Lartey wrote:
> The Palmas familly of chips has LED support. This is not always muxed
> to output pins so depending on the setting of the mux this driver
> will create the appropriate LED class devices.

> +static struct of_device_id of_palmas_match_tbl[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "ti,palmas-leds", },
> +	{ /* end */ }
> +};

Is there DT binding documentation for this compatible value somewhere?