From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add additional GPMC timing parameters Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:27:14 -0600 Message-ID: <51312B42.4090005@ti.com> References: <1361899842-30303-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <1361899842-30303-13-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Tony Lindgren , Benoit Cousson , device-tree , linux-omap , linux-arm , Daniel Mack List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/01/2013 02:11 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > [...] >> >> + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,bus-turnaround", &val)) >> + gpmc_t->bus_turnaround = val; >> + > > AFAIK, you don't need to test if the property is defined. > You can just read it straightforward, and if the property is not defined > then nothing will be stored in your variable: > > of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,bus-turnaround", &gpmc_t->bus_turnaround); > > You can simplify *a lot* your patch with this, and I believe you could > also clean > existent code. True. I was just being consistent with the existing code in gpmc_read_timings_dt(). May be I can clean-up the entire function. Cheers Jon