From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add additional GPMC timing parameters Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 16:27:49 -0600 Message-ID: <51312B65.1050109@ti.com> References: <1361899842-30303-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <1361899842-30303-13-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ezequiel Garcia Cc: Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Tony Lindgren , Benoit Cousson , device-tree , linux-omap , linux-arm , Daniel Mack List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/01/2013 02:12 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> Hi Jon, >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> [...] >>> >>> + if (!of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,bus-turnaround", &val)) >>> + gpmc_t->bus_turnaround = val; >>> + >> >> AFAIK, you don't need to test if the property is defined. >> You can just read it straightforward, and if the property is not defined >> then nothing will be stored in your variable: >> >> of_property_read_u32(np, "gpmc,bus-turnaround", &gpmc_t->bus_turnaround); >> >> You can simplify *a lot* your patch with this, and I believe you could >> also clean >> existent code. >> > > Also, since this is somewhat large patchset: would you mind pushing it somewhere > so I can just pull a branch? See link in cover-letter ;-) Jon