devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: "Manjunathappa, Prakash" <prakash.pm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org"
	<davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
	<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org"
	<rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org"
	<grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"hs-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org"
	<hs-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: davinci: da850 evm: update clock rate for UART 1/2 DT nodes
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:07:39 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51433233.9070303@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A73F36158E33644199EB82C5EC81C7BC3EA49090-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>



On 3/15/2013 6:56 PM, Manjunathappa, Prakash wrote:
> Hi Sekhar,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 16:09:47, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>> Prakash,
>>
>> On 2/19/2013 2:02 PM, Manjunathappa, Prakash wrote:
>>> DT kernel with latest of denx SPL U-boot boots with garbled UART
>>> logs. This is because in U-boot UART2 gets sourced by PLL0_SYSCLK2
>>> configured for 150MHz. But later in kernel UART2 gets mapped to
>>> PLL1_SYSCLK2 and is configured for 132MHz not for 150MHz.
>>>
>>> PLL1 is configured for 264MHz to support mDDR on the EVM. That is
>>> memory controller driving mDDR can be configured for 150MHz and
>>> mDDR it self can operate at 132MHz.
>>>
>>> So override UART1 and UART2 DT node clock-frequency property with
>>> rate available on da850 EVM.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manjunathappa, Prakash <prakash.pm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> How about dropping the clock-frequency attribute altogether? of_serial.c
>> seems to be falling back on clk apis if frequency is not passed and that
>> should make the kernel work with all versions of U-Boot.
>>
> 
> Yes it can be dropped by having duplicate clock node for UART having only

You meant an additional clk_lookup entry? That's different from a new
'struct clk' node.

> dev_id. This is required because DT kernel does the clk_get with only dev_id
> and non-DT kernel only with con_id. In DT kernel clk_get is done from generic
> code of_platform_serial_setup:of_serial.c and in non-DT kernel is done from
> platform code, davinci_serial_setup_clk:arch/arm/mach-davinci/serial.c
> 
> Please let me know your opinion on this.

When only one clock is present, con_id of NULL is more appropriate. How
about fixing arch/arm/mach-davinci/serial.c and existing clk_lookup
entries to use this?

Thanks,
Sekhar

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-15 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-19  8:32 [PATCH] ARM: davinci: da850 evm: update clock rate for UART 1/2 DT nodes Manjunathappa, Prakash
     [not found] ` <1361262734-8540-1-git-send-email-prakash.pm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-02-28 10:39   ` Sekhar Nori
     [not found]     ` <512F33F3.9070203-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-15 13:26       ` Manjunathappa, Prakash
     [not found]         ` <A73F36158E33644199EB82C5EC81C7BC3EA49090-Er742YJ7I/eIQmiDNMet8wC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2013-03-15 14:37           ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2013-04-09  5:31             ` Manjunathappa, Prakash

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51433233.9070303@ti.com \
    --to=nsekhar-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hs-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=prakash.pm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).