From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] gpio: samsung: Skip legacy GPIO registration if pinctrl-s3c64xx is present Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:33:38 +0900 Message-ID: <51769BC2.9010507@gmail.com> References: <1366060483-20342-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <1366060483-20342-4-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <20130416162750.GO26958@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <22399020.Z89v9QS8su@flatron> <20130417130609.GA13687@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130417130609.GA13687@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Tomasz Figa , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, kgene.kim@samsung.com, kwangwoo.lee@gmail.com, jacmet@sunsite.dk, augulis.darius@gmail.com, mcuelenaere@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 04/17/13 22:06, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:35:58AM +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> On Tuesday 16 of April 2013 17:27:50 Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Strictly speaking this is a separate bug fix (though I see that's >>> already in -next separately anyway so whatever). > I agree with this. >> Right. But this fix is so small that I thought it would be a major waste >> of mail server processing power to send it as a separate patch. > But the fix would be value... > There's reviewer bandwidth too - one of the things people check for is > that the change is doing what it's supposed to do, extra stuff in there > is usually a red flag. Thanks. - Kukjin