From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] at_hdmac: dt dma bindings update Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 10:04:37 +0200 Message-ID: <51A85995.1050909@atmel.com> References: <1369930103-11963-1-git-send-email-ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> <20130530172649.GC3767@intel.com> <20130530201321.GE23653@game.jcrosoft.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130530201321.GE23653-RQcB7r2h9QmfDR2tN2SG5Ni2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , Vinod Koul , Arnd Bergmann Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 30/05/2013 22:13, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD : > On 22:56 Thu 30 May , Vinod Koul wrote: >> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 06:08:20PM +0200, ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote: >>> From: Ludovic Desroches >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This set of patches update the dt dma binding for at_hdmac since we need one >>> more parameter. In order to keep backward compatibility, an existing cell will >>> be used to add this parameter. Since the content of that cell will become a >>> magic value due to the concatenation of the two parameters, it is time to >>> use macros. >> which tree is this targetted to be applied? > > arm-soc as this depends on alreadied applied cleanup I've ... already pushed (it must be the end of your sentence, Jean-Christophe...) Vinod, Arnd, - patch 1 shall be applied before any of the two others of the series - patch 2 is pure DT modification, but relies on Jean-Christophe's already pushed cleanup branch in arm-soc - patch 3 is the pure dmaengine one, but relies on the 1st patch So, maybe the preferred way to include this material upstream is to go through arm-soc as suggested by Jean-Christophe. Bye, >> Arnd, can you review this series and ack if this needs to be applied thru >> dmaengine? > > I prefer the invert > > Best Regards, > J. >> >> -- >> ~Vinod >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Ludovic Desroches (3): >>> ARM: at91: dt: add header to define at_hdmac configuration >>> ARM: at91: dt: switch DMA DT bindings to pre-processor >>> at_hdmac: add FIFO configuration parameter to DMA DT binding >>> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/atmel-dma.txt | 7 ++++-- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi | 5 ++-- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi | 11 +++++---- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi | 17 +++++++------- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d3.dtsi | 19 +++++++-------- >>> drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---- >>> include/dt-bindings/dma/at91.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 7 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/dma/at91.h >>> >>> -- >>> 1.7.11.3 >>> >> >> -- > -- Nicolas Ferre