From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladimir Pantelic Subject: Re: getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1)) Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:48:22 +0200 Message-ID: <51B19046.5040401@gmail.com> References: <51AFA6DD.3000202@wwwdotorg.org> <1370469574.18839.33.camel@localhost> <1370475609.20454.44.camel@localhost> <1370477958.20454.68.camel@localhost> <51B085C6.3000605@gmail.com> Reply-To: Linux on small ARM machines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: arm-netbook-bounces@lists.phcomp.co.uk Sender: "arm-netbook" To: Linux on small ARM machines Cc: debian-arm@lists.debian.org, devicetree-discuss , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ARM Linux Mailing List , debian-kernel@lists.debian.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org luke.leighton wrote: > On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Vladimir Pantelic wrote: > >> 4 days? WTF? since when did setting an ultimatum to the kernel >> community work? > > i was only informed of the opportunity 2 days ago, vladimir. this is > an important meeting. of course the linux kernel community is > entirely free to: > > * completely ignore this opportunity > * continue to complain that soc vendors do not follow their > unilaterally-decided rules SoC vendors are free to join the discussion, and many SoC vendors are part of the kernel community, so calling this unilateral is plain wrong. > 3 days remaining on the clock. what catastrophic thing will happen when the time runs out?