From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oded Gabbay Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MMC: FSL SDHC: Add support for hard-wired (permanent) card. Kernel version 3.4.47 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:43:12 +0300 Message-ID: <51B5D7F0.4050708@advaoptical.com> References: <1370155128-680-1-git-send-email-ogabbay@advaoptical.com> <51B57266.9050107@de.bosch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51B57266.9050107@de.bosch.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dirk Behme Cc: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "cjb@laptop.org" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "rob@landley.net" , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Dirk, You are absolutely right. I will revise my patch series to reflect the change. Basically, I will call the generic mmc_of_parse from the probe function of Freescale's driver. That will handle all the additional capabilities. Thanks Oded On 06/10/2013 09:29 AM, Dirk Behme wrote: > On 02.06.2013 08:38, Oded Gabbay wrote: >> This patch adds support of recognizing hard-wired (permanent) cards >> to Freescale's SDHC host driver. This is done by adding the option >> "fsl,card-wired" to the SDHC device-tree entry. Detection of this >> option is done in the probe function. Update documentation in file >> fsl-esdhc.txt > > Why don't you want to introduce "fsl,card-wired"? Why don't you use > "non-removable"? > > To my understanding the patch > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=7f217794ffa72f208a250b79ab0b7ea3de19677f > > > explicitly removed "fsl,card-wired". So I don't think re-introducing > it is a good idea? > > Best regards > > Dirk