devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Austin <jonathan.austin@arm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add missing node iteration stubs for disabled CONFIG_OF
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:22:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B74EDF.2090504@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5159F9E6.50508@gmail.com>

Hi Rob, Thomasz,

(dredging up an oldish thread as I just ran in to this issue)

On 01/04/13 22:19, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 03/09/2013 02:15 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> This patch moves several for_each macros out of the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> block and adds inline stubs for functions used by these macros, compiled
>> conditionally when CONFIG_OF is not enabled.
>>
>> This eliminates the need to explicitly check for CONFIG_OF in driver
>> code using mentioned functions and macros.
> 
> Do you have some users of this?

I do!

Or at least I might.

I'm not certain as perhaps the fix to what I describe below is to add
dependencies on CONFIG_OF - it isn't clear to me either way:

With both psci and arch_timers (CONFIG_ARM_PSCI, CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER)
and without CONFIG_OF we get a build failure because we lack the definition
of of_find_matching_node():

eg:
arch/arm/kernel/psci.c:167:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘of_find_matching_node’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

The same happens with arm_arch_timer.c (well, there's a patch required to
include linux/of.h first, after which Thomasz's patch is relevant).

So, I guess the question is whether we should expect PSCI and ARM_ARCH_TIMER
to depend on CONFIG_OF, or whether we'd like them to fail gracefully in the
case that we *don't* have CONFIG_OF. I think the current situation is broken
either way...

Thoughts?

Jonny

> 
> Rob
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   include/linux/of.h | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>   1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
>> index a0f1292..7a736b8 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/of.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
>> @@ -86,6 +86,31 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_node_get(struct device_node *node)
>>   static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node) { }
>>   #endif /* !CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC */
>>
>> +#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
>> +     for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
>> +          dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
>> +#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
>> +     for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
>> +          dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
>> +#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
>> +     for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible); dn; \
>> +          dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
>> +#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
>> +     for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
>> +          dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
>> +#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
>> +     for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches, match); \
>> +          dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match))
>> +#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>> +     for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>> +          child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
>> +#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>> +     for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>> +          child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, child))
>> +#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
>> +     for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
>> +          dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
>> +
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>
>>   /* Pointer for first entry in chain of all nodes. */
>> @@ -167,19 +192,10 @@ static inline const char *of_node_full_name(const struct device_node *np)
>>
>>   extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
>>        const char *name);
>> -#define for_each_node_by_name(dn, name) \
>> -     for (dn = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); dn; \
>> -          dn = of_find_node_by_name(dn, name))
>>   extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
>>        const char *type);
>> -#define for_each_node_by_type(dn, type) \
>> -     for (dn = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, type); dn; \
>> -          dn = of_find_node_by_type(dn, type))
>>   extern struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(struct device_node *from,
>>        const char *type, const char *compat);
>> -#define for_each_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible) \
>> -     for (dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, type, compatible); dn; \
>> -          dn = of_find_compatible_node(dn, type, compatible))
>>   extern struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
>>        struct device_node *from,
>>        const struct of_device_id *matches,
>> @@ -190,12 +206,6 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(
>>   {
>>        return of_find_matching_node_and_match(from, matches, NULL);
>>   }
>> -#define for_each_matching_node(dn, matches) \
>> -     for (dn = of_find_matching_node(NULL, matches); dn; \
>> -          dn = of_find_matching_node(dn, matches))
>> -#define for_each_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match) \
>> -     for (dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(NULL, matches, match); \
>> -          dn; dn = of_find_matching_node_and_match(dn, matches, match))
>>   extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_path(const char *path);
>>   extern struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle);
>>   extern struct device_node *of_get_parent(const struct device_node *node);
>> @@ -207,14 +217,6 @@ extern struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
>>
>>   extern struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(const struct device_node *node,
>>                                        const char *name);
>> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>> -     for (child = of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>> -          child = of_get_next_child(parent, child))
>> -
>> -#define for_each_available_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>> -     for (child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \
>> -          child = of_get_next_available_child(parent, child))
>> -
>>   static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>   {
>>        struct device_node *child;
>> @@ -228,10 +230,6 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>
>>   extern struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
>>        struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name);
>> -#define for_each_node_with_property(dn, prop_name) \
>> -     for (dn = of_find_node_with_property(NULL, prop_name); dn; \
>> -          dn = of_find_node_with_property(dn, prop_name))
>> -
>>   extern struct property *of_find_property(const struct device_node *np,
>>                                         const char *name,
>>                                         int *lenp);
>> @@ -353,13 +351,28 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_name(struct device_node *from,
>>        return NULL;
>>   }
>>
>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_type(struct device_node *from,
>> +     const char *type)
>> +{
>> +     return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static inline bool of_have_populated_dt(void)
>>   {
>>        return false;
>>   }
>>
>> -#define for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
>> -     while (0)
>> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
>> +                                          struct device_node *prev)
>> +{
>> +     return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(
>> +     const struct device_node *node, struct device_node *prev)
>> +{
>> +     return NULL;
>> +}
>>
>>   static inline struct device_node *of_get_child_by_name(
>>                                        const struct device_node *node,
>> @@ -373,6 +386,12 @@ static inline int of_get_child_count(const struct device_node *np)
>>        return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_with_property(
>> +     struct device_node *from, const char *prop_name)
>> +{
>> +     return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static inline int of_device_is_compatible(const struct device_node *device,
>>                                          const char *name)
>>   {
>> @@ -394,6 +413,21 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_compatible_node(
>>        return NULL;
>>   }
>>
>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(
>> +     struct device_node *from,
>> +     const struct of_device_id *matches,
>> +     const struct of_device_id **match)
>> +{
>> +     return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_matching_node(
>> +     struct device_node *from,
>> +     const struct of_device_id *matches)
>> +{
>> +     return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static inline int of_property_read_u8_array(const struct device_node *np,
>>                        const char *propname, u8 *out_values, size_t sz)
>>   {
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-11 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-09 20:15 [PATCH] of: Add missing node iteration stubs for disabled CONFIG_OF Tomasz Figa
     [not found] ` <1362860154-3089-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-04-01 21:19   ` Rob Herring
2013-06-11 16:22     ` Jonathan Austin [this message]
     [not found]       ` <51B74EDF.2090504-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2013-06-11 21:51         ` Grant Likely
2013-06-11 22:35           ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-12 10:10           ` Jonathan Austin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B74EDF.2090504@arm.com \
    --to=jonathan.austin@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).