From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: tegra: basic support for Trusted Foundations Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:25:17 -0600 Message-ID: <51BB35DD.4030004@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1371114745-24710-1-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <1371114745-24710-2-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com> <51BA1B41.6030002@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Alexandre Courbot Cc: Alexandre Courbot , Joseph Lo , Karan Jhavar , Varun Wadekar , Chris Johnson , Matthew Longnecker , Russell King - ARM Linux , Tomasz Figa , Dave Martin , Jassi Brar , "devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06/14/2013 02:27 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 06/13/2013 03:12 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> Add basic support for booting secondary processors on Tegra devices >>> using the Trusted Foundations secure monitor. >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/firmware.c >> >>> +void __init tegra_init_firmware(void) ... >>> + node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "tl,trusted-foundations"); >>> + if (node && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TEGRA_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS)) >>> + pr_warn("Trusted Foundations detected but support missing!\n"); >>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TEGRA_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS) >>> + else if (node) >>> + register_firmware_ops(&tegra_trusted_foundations_ops); >>> +#endif >>> +} >> >> Is it worth continuing on in the node && !IS_ENABLED case here? After >> all, we can be pretty certain that the write to the CPU reset vector is >> immediately going to trap... > > That's what was happening until 3.9, but from 3.10 on the trap is > apparently handled and the boot completes (although with only one > processor). Why does that happen; surely the kernel shouldn't be ignoring failures? How does it recover?