From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 10/11] ARM: dts: omap4 clock data Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:24:22 -0700 Message-ID: <51C3AB46.4040609@codeaurora.org> References: <1371647942-4811-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1371647942-4811-11-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1371647942-4811-11-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tero Kristo Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@linaro.org, paul@pwsan.com, tony@atomide.com, nm@ti.com, rnayak@ti.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06/19/13 06:19, Tero Kristo wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi > index 2a56428..70608db 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi > @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ > ti,hwmods = "counter_32k"; > }; > > + /include/ "omap4-clocks.dtsi" > + Doesn't this cause one platform device to be allocated for each clock node defined in omap4-clocks.dtsi? Are you concerned about wasting memory on things that aren't really devices and that will never be probed? > omap4_pmx_core: pinmux@4a100040 { > compatible = "ti,omap4-padconf", "pinctrl-single"; > reg = <0x4a100040 0x0196>; -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation