Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: model SMPS10 as two regulators

[Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>]

On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:56 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>
>> Have you added the regulator supply entries?
>> Are you testing on mainline linux-next?
> Not in linux-next :-( Tested only with mainline.
> Does inverting the order helps?
>

I think because you do not have entry of supply in your dt node, it gets 
ignored by regulator_dev_lookup() and continue.

I made the entry like (added entry form smps10-out2-supply and 
smps10-in-supply in dt node) and then it failed.
/***

+                           smps10-out2-supply = <&palmas_smps10_out2_reg>;
+                           smps10-in-supply = <&tps65090_dcdc3_reg>;
                             ldo3-in-supply = <&palmas_smps3_reg>;
@@ -903,6 +905,20 @@
                                         regulator-always-on;
                                 };

+                               palmas_smps10_out1_reg: smps10_out1 {
+                                       regulator-name = "smps10_out1";
+                                       regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
+                                       regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
+                                       regulator-always-on;
+                               };
+
+                               palmas_smps10_out2_reg: smps10_out2 {
+                                       regulator-name = "smps10_out2";
+                                       regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
+                                       regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
+                                       regulator-always-on;
+                               };
+
**/


After reversing the sequence, it worked fine.