[PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[Stephen Warren]

From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Many useful new features have been added to dtc since the last release.
Projects that use dtc wish to test the version number to determine
which features are available. Increment the version number to allow this.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
---
 Makefile | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 1169e6c..962f94e 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 # CONFIG_LOCALVERSION from some future config system.
 #
 VERSION = 1
-PATCHLEVEL = 3
+PATCHLEVEL = 4
 SUBLEVEL = 0
 EXTRAVERSION =
 LOCAL_VERSION =
-- 
1.8.1.5

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[David Gibson]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 685 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:11:25AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Many useful new features have been added to dtc since the last release.
> Projects that use dtc wish to test the version number to determine
> which features are available. Increment the version number to allow
> this.

Hrm.  We should make a new release.  But I don't think we should bump
the version without actuall rolling a release.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[Stephen Warren]

On 06/14/2013 07:12 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:11:25AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> 
>> Many useful new features have been added to dtc since the last
>> release. Projects that use dtc wish to test the version number to
>> determine which features are available. Increment the version
>> number to allow this.
> 
> Hrm.  We should make a new release.  But I don't think we should
> bump the version without actuall rolling a release.

I figured that applying this patch /would/ be making a new release;
well - apply the patch, and create a tag with the same version.

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[Grant Likely]

On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 21:05:30 -0600, Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 07:12 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:11:25AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >> 
> >> Many useful new features have been added to dtc since the last
> >> release. Projects that use dtc wish to test the version number to
> >> determine which features are available. Increment the version
> >> number to allow this.
> > 
> > Hrm.  We should make a new release.  But I don't think we should
> > bump the version without actuall rolling a release.
> 
> I figured that applying this patch /would/ be making a new release;
> well - apply the patch, and create a tag with the same version.

Yes, that's what I was assuming you meant too.

g.

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[Jon Loeliger]

> 
> Hrm.  We should make a new release.  But I don't think we should bump
> the version without actuall rolling a release.

..and are we ready to do so?

jdl

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[Stephen Warren]

On 06/15/2013 09:32 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>>
>> Hrm.  We should make a new release.  But I don't think we should bump
>> the version without actuall rolling a release.
> 
> ..and are we ready to do so?

I don't see anyone saying no...

How about if nobody objects, a release is made by the end of the week?

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[David Gibson]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 03:28:22PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 06/15/2013 09:32 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >>
> >> Hrm.  We should make a new release.  But I don't think we should bump
> >> the version without actuall rolling a release.
> > 
> > ..and are we ready to do so?
> 
> I don't see anyone saying no...
> 
> How about if nobody objects, a release is made by the end of the
> week?

Works for me.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 192 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[Stephen Warren]

On 06/17/2013 05:42 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 03:28:22PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 06/15/2013 09:32 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hrm.  We should make a new release.  But I don't think we
>>>> should bump the version without actuall rolling a release.
>>> 
>>> ..and are we ready to do so?
>> 
>> I don't see anyone saying no...
>> 
>> How about if nobody objects, a release is made by the end of the 
>> week?
> 
> Works for me.

Great! I didn't see any objections, and the week is basically over.
Are we good for a release today?

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[Jon Loeliger]

> >> 
> >> How about if nobody objects, a release is made by the end of the 
> >> week?
> > 
> > Works for me.
> 
> Great! I didn't see any objections, and the week is basically over.
> Are we good for a release today?

I get it, thanks.  I also have to have time to do it.

jdl

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[Jon Loeliger]

> 
> Great! I didn't see any objections, and the week is basically over.
> Are we good for a release today?

Hear Ye!  Hear Ye!

With a Mandate from the Masses for a tagged release,
your wish has finally been granted!

    $ git tag -v v1.4.0
    object 65cc4d2748a2c2e6f27f1cf39e07a5dbabd80ebf
    type commit
    tag v1.4.0
    tagger Jon Loeliger <jdl-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org> 1371924387 -0500

    DTC 1.4.0

    The Mandate from the Masses release.
    gpg: Signature made Sat 22 Jun 2013 01:06:41 PM CDT using RSA key ID B0272867
    gpg: Good signature from "Jon Loeliger <jdl-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org>"

Enjoy,
jdl

Re: [PATCH] Bump version number to 1.4.0

[Stephen Warren]

On 06/22/2013 12:23 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>>
>> Great! I didn't see any objections, and the week is basically over.
>> Are we good for a release today?
> 
> Hear Ye!  Hear Ye!
> 
> With a Mandate from the Masses for a tagged release,
> your wish has finally been granted!

Excellent! Thank you very much. I guess I should go file some bugs
against distros to get this updated version packaged.