From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] clocksource:arm_global_timer: Add ARM global timer support. Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:00:18 -0700 Message-ID: <51C8C172.8020207@codeaurora.org> References: <1372089195-29219-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@st.com> <51C8A6C8.8000009@codeaurora.org> <51C8B551.9080203@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51C8B551.9080203@st.com> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: srinivas.kandagatla@st.com Cc: John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Rob Landley , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Stuart Menefy , Arnd Bergmann , Rob Herring , Will Deacon List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06/24/13 14:08, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: > On 24/06/13 21:06, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 06/24/13 08:53, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: >>> + >>> +static void gt_clockevents_stop(struct clock_event_device *clk) >>> +{ >>> + gt_clockevent_set_mode(CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED, clk); >>> + disable_percpu_irq(clk->irq); >>> +} >>> + >>> +static int __cpuinit gt_clockevents_setup(struct clock_event_device *clk) >>> +{ >>> + struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(gt_evt); >>> + return evt->name ? 0 : gt_clockevents_init(evt); >>> +} >> How does this work? gt_clockevents_stop() is using the >> clock_event_device struct from the ARM local timer layer whereas >> gt_clockevents_setup() is using a driver private allocation. > Thanks for pointing this.. > This should fix it. > > static void gt_clockevents_stop(struct clock_event_device *clk) > { > struct clock_event_device *evt = this_cpu_ptr(gt_evt); > gt_clockevent_set_mode(CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED, evt); > disable_percpu_irq(evt->irq); > } Looks good, but even better would be to not use the local timer API. > Please just >> don't use the local timer API at all and use cpu notifiers instead. > Last time when I did try using cpu notifiers like arm_arch_timer, the > broadcast dummy timer did kick off and took over the local timer on the > secondary cpus. Resulting in lot of broadcast IPI's. > > If I use cpu notifiers I will end up two clk events on a each core (one > dummy from arm/kernel/smp.c and other gt clk_evt). I think I can only > use cpu notifiers in my case once your patches are in. > Also I cant disable LOCAL_TIMERS as it y by default. > > Am I missing something? > > Am happy to move to cpu notifiers if it works, else the driver will be > broken. I think the problem is your clockevent has no rating. Please give it a rating (300?) so that it prevents the dummy from taking over. You don't need to worry about disabling the local timer API, it will register a harmless clockevent with a low rating (100) that should be ignored. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation