From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tero Kristo Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: OMAP5: clockdomain data: add init file for omap54xx Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:24:25 +0300 Message-ID: <51CC04C9.3050801@ti.com> References: <1372322299-25046-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1372322299-25046-3-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <20130627084434.GT15455@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130627084434.GT15455@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: balbi@ti.com Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com, tony@atomide.com, mturquette@linaro.org, nm@ti.com, rnayak@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06/27/2013 11:44 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:38:17AM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote: >> + rc = clk_set_parent(abe_dpll_ref, sys_32k_ck); >> + abe_dpll = clk_get_sys(NULL, "dpll_abe_ck"); > > should these two lines be swaped ? No, its a different clock. clk_set_parent is done for a clock that is a parent of dpll_abe_ck. > >> + if (!rc) >> + rc = clk_set_rate(abe_dpll, OMAP5_DPLL_ABE_DEFFREQ); >> + if (rc) >> + pr_err("%s: failed to configure ABE DPLL!\n", __func__); >> + >> + return 0; > > so even if (rc) you still return 0 ? Shouldn't you return rc instead ? Hmm yea, this could be improved. :) Same should be done for O4 / DRA7 also. Seems like a long lasting feature actually. -Tero