From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] rtc: omap: add rtc wakeup support to alarm events Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:32:34 +0530 Message-ID: <51D26CFA.5090500@ti.com> References: <1372412109-986-1-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> <1372412109-986-4-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1372412109-986-4-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: Errors-To: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org To: Hebbar Gururaja Cc: Alessandro Zummo , davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org, b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org, rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , Rob Landley , Grant Likely , linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 6/28/2013 3:05 PM, Hebbar Gururaja wrote: > On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN) > is available to enable Alarm Wakeup feature. This register needs to be > properly handled for the rtcwake to work properly. > > Platforms using such IP should set "ti,am3352-rtc" in rtc device dt > compatibility node. > > Signed-off-by: Hebbar Gururaja > Cc: Grant Likely > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Rob Landley > Cc: Sekhar Nori > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Cc: Alessandro Zummo > Cc: rtc-linux-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org > Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org > Cc: linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > --- [...] > -#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX 1 > +#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX 1 > +#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_AM335X_IDX 2 > > static struct platform_device_id omap_rtc_devtype[] = { > { > @@ -309,6 +321,9 @@ static struct platform_device_id omap_rtc_devtype[] = { > }, { > .name = "da830-rtc", > .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER, > + }, { > + .name = "am335x-rtc", may be use am3352-rtc here just to keep the platform device name and of compatible in sync. > + .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER | OMAP_RTC_HAS_IRQWAKEEN, > }, > {}, It is better to use the index defined above in the static initialization so they remain in sync. ... [OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX] = { .name = "da830-rtc", .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER, }, ... > }; > @@ -318,6 +333,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id omap_rtc_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "ti,da830-rtc", > .data = &omap_rtc_devtype[OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX], > }, > + { .compatible = "ti,am3352-rtc", > + .data = &omap_rtc_devtype[OMAP_RTC_DATA_AM335X_IDX], > + }, > {}, > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_rtc_of_match); Apart from these minor issues, the patch looks good to me. Acked-by: Sekhar Nori Thanks, Sekhar