Re: [RFC PATCH 08/13] sound: sam9x5_wm8731: machine driver for at91sam9x5 wm8731 boards

[Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>]

Hi Richard,

On 7/5/2013 23:15, Richard Genoud wrote:
>>> +       card->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> >>+       card->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>> >>+       card->dai_link = dai;
>>> >>+       card->num_links = 1;
>>> >>+       dai->name = "WM8731";
>>> >>+       dai->stream_name = "WM8731 PCM";
>>> >>+       dai->codec_dai_name = "wm8731-hifi";
>>> >>+       dai->init = at91sam9x5ek_wm8731_init;
>>> >>+       card->dapm_widgets = at91sam9x5ek_dapm_widgets;
>>> >>+       card->num_dapm_widgets = ARRAY_SIZE(at91sam9x5ek_dapm_widgets);
>> >
>> >
>> >Will keep these as snd_soc_card and snd_soc_dai_link structure separately?
> I don't really understand what you mean here.
> do you mean that something like that will more explicit ? :
> +       card->dai_link[0].name = "WM8731";
> +       card->dai_link[0].stream_name = "WM8731 PCM";
> +       card->dai_link[0].codec_dai_name = "wm8731-hifi";
> +       card->dai_link[0].init = at91sam9x5ek_wm8731_init;
>

I mean using structure to define snd_soc_card and snd_soc_dai_link, look 
like:
struct snd_soc_dai_link dai_link_name = {
	.name = xxx,
	.stream_name = xxx,
	...
};

struct snd_soc_card card_name = {
	.name = xxxx
	.ower = THIS_MODULE,
	.dai_link = &dai_link_name,
	...
};

In this way, I think it will be more clear than put them in code.

Best Regards,
Bo Shen