From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/13] ARM: dts: Add AK8975 device node for Exynos4412 TRATS2 board Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 14:52:51 +0200 Message-ID: <51DAB623.1010404@samsung.com> References: <1372692155-17653-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <1372692155-17653-8-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> <1491290.c836bFtNe2@flatron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <1491290.c836bFtNe2@flatron> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tomasz Figa Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, t.figa@samsung.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, phil.carmody@partner.samsung.com, j.anaszewski@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Tomasz, On 07/06/2013 01:18 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On Monday 01 of July 2013 17:22:29 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> From: Jacek Anaszewski >> >> This patch adds AK8975 magnetometer node and corresponding >> i2c-gpio bus node for TRATS2 board. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park >> Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts index 056b835..b9de3b5 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412-trats2.dts >> @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ >> model = "Samsung Trats 2 based on Exynos4412"; >> compatible = "samsung,trats2", "samsung,exynos4412"; >> >> + aliases { >> + i2c8 = &i2c_ak8975; >> + }; >> + >> memory { >> reg = <0x40000000 0x40000000>; >> }; >> @@ -453,4 +457,19 @@ >> serial@13830000 { >> status = "okay"; >> }; >> + >> + i2c_ak8975: i2c-gpio@0 { > > I think this @0 is slightly incorrect here, as it seems like there is no > reg property present inside the node and so the device isn't located at > any address. > > For logical indices like in this case I would rather use i2c-gpio-0 > instead. Indeed, using "-" postfix sounds like a better alternative. I'll change it and repost the series after 3.11-rc1 is released. >> + compatible = "i2c-gpio"; >> + gpios = <&gpy2 4 0>, <&gpy2 5 0>; >> + i2c-gpio,delay-us = <2>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <0>; >> + status = "okay"; >> + >> + ak8975@0c { >> + compatible = "asahi-kasei,ak8975"; >> + reg = <0x0c>; >> + gpios = <&gpj0 7 0>; >> + }; >> + }; >> }; > > Otherwise looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa -- Thanks, Sylwester