From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] reset: Add driver for gpio-controlled reset pins Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:48:00 -0600 Message-ID: <51E56B30.7030302@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1369904940-716-1-git-send-email-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20130716015038.GD28375@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <51E4BF98.8030604@wwwdotorg.org> <1373968758.4327.17.camel@pizza.hi.pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1373968758.4327.17.camel-/rZezPiN1rtR6QfukMTsflXZhhPuCNm+@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Philipp Zabel Cc: Marek Vasut , Fabio Estevam , Mike Turquette , Len Brown , Sascha Hauer , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/16/2013 03:59 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote: ... > Deferred probing is fine, but it'd be nice to keep the probe deferral > loops to a minimum where possible and/or reasonable. I agree, but manually selecting initcalls for drivers is not the solution. See my other email.