From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Refactor device tree maintainership Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:31:16 -0500 Message-ID: <51ED9694.9060303@gmail.com> References: <1374290388-19308-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> <1374290388-19308-3-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> <51EC2EC7.6010001@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Ian Campbell , Pawel Moll , devicetree-discuss List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/21/2013 07:35 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On 07/19/2013 10:19 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> +OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS >>> +M: Pawel Moll >>> +M: Mark Rutland >>> +M: Stephen Warren >>> +M: Ian Campbell >> >> You can add me. I was not intending to step down. > > Done. > >> What about creating an email alias for the group instead? > > Would that be any different from the mailing list address? My own selfish desire is to easily separate emails for DT bindings and DT core code. I suppose I could do that with a suffix on my email address. It seems to work well for arm-soc where you have a group of maintainers and don't necessarily know who is actively maintaining things. Not sure if we want to timeshare like that, but it would give us the flexibility. Rob