From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Mack Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] impedance-matcher generic improvements Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:48:51 +0200 Message-ID: <51F76FE3.1080302@gmail.com> References: <51F2A014.7000209@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jason Cooper Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Pitre List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Jason, On 29.07.2013 23:23, Jason Cooper wrote: > Basic idea is to replace a device's stock kernel with this impedance-matcher. > Load the kernel and/or the devicetree blob to desired addresses. Add > 'loadaddrs=0xXXXXXXXX,0xYYYYYYYY' to the kernel's command line. Or, if you are > appending, 'loadaddrs=appended,0xYYYYYYYY'. First address is the location of > the kernel, second is the location of the dtb. Nice to see that idea implemented! For me though, changing any of the U-Boot variables is out of the question, and I need the matcher just the way I implemented it, including the LED blink pattern to let the user know if things go wrong. Hence, I won't change to your generic version on my boards, and so I think it might be best if you maintain your own tree for your approach. Best regards, Daniel