From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org list"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
Eric Holmberg <eholmber@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 09:30:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52090DAC.3050407@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbZSJmMz_U56ZsppBrB64XvTHBqJM4L+uFY1kKxhMCCtMQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 08/10/13 12:11, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Otherwise, Stephen - do we have your Ack here? I was happy to see your
> review but not sure what's the latest status.
The smp_mb() should be removed. Otherwise I'm willing to accept that we
only build this driver on ARCH_MSM for now. We can fix that in the
future to be available to hexagon if they ever want it. After that it
just needs a DT review/ack so I'll be happy to add a reviewed-by on v3.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-12 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-29 20:11 [PATCH] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block Kumar Gala
2013-07-29 20:14 ` Kumar Gala
2013-07-29 21:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-29 21:54 ` Kumar Gala
2013-07-30 0:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-01 14:10 ` Kumar Gala
2013-08-10 19:11 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2013-08-12 16:30 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-08-12 17:00 ` Kumar Gala
2013-08-12 17:24 ` Kumar Gala
2013-08-13 6:01 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2013-08-13 13:58 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52090DAC.3050407@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eholmber@codeaurora.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jhugo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).