From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Daney Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] DT: MIPS: ralink: add RT2880 dts files Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:44:49 -0700 Message-ID: <5217ADA1.4070100@gmail.com> References: <1365843026-11015-1-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <1365843026-11015-4-git-send-email-blogic@openwrt.org> <5217AB25.3050106@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5217AB25.3050106@cogentembedded.com> Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: John Crispin , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/23/2013 11:34 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 04/13/2013 12:50 PM, John Crispin wrote: > >> Add a dtsi file for RT2880 SoC and a sample dts file. > > You forgot to mention Kconfig entry... > >> Signed-off-by: John Crispin > [...] > >> diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/dts/Makefile >> b/arch/mips/ralink/dts/Makefile >> index 1a69fb3..f635a01 100644 >> --- a/arch/mips/ralink/dts/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/dts/Makefile >> @@ -1 +1,2 @@ >> +obj-$(CONFIG_DTB_RT2880_EVAL) := rt2880_eval.dtb.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_DTB_RT305X_EVAL) := rt3052_eval.dtb.o >> diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/dts/rt2880.dtsi >> b/arch/mips/ralink/dts/rt2880.dtsi >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..182afde >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/dts/rt2880.dtsi >> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ >> +/ { >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "ralink,rt2880-soc"; >> + >> + cpus { >> + cpu@0 { >> + compatible = "mips,mips4KEc"; >> + }; >> + }; >> + >> + cpuintc: cpuintc@0 { > > According to ePAPR spec [1], the node name should be > "interrupt-controller". > >> + #address-cells = <0>; >> + #interrupt-cells = <1>; >> + interrupt-controller; >> + compatible = "mti,cpu-interrupt-controller"; > > So, it's "mips" or "mti"? I agree that it should be consistent. vendor-prefixes.txt doesn't have an entry for MIPS, so ... Isn't this the CP0 interrupt controller? I wonder if something like: "mips,r4k-cp0-interrupt-controller" might be more descriptive. David Daney