From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] misc: Add crossbar driver Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:44:46 -0400 Message-ID: <5217BBAE.2030703@ti.com> References: <51E83A4F.5080904@ti.com> <51ED2385.60108@ti.com> <51ED5C66.1010407@ti.com> <51EFFBE1.4090505@ti.com> <51F0031B.1050307@ti.com> <51F00530.9090703@ti.com> <51F02069.3050207@ti.com> <51F0223E.4050008@ti.com> <51F0240F.3050507@ti.com> <20130813081003.GU7656@atomide.com> <520A02BA.4090805@ti.com> <520D398D.9040806@ti.com> <520D44C5.6080205@ti.com> <5215F6F6.9060703@ti.com> <5216E966.5020902@ti.com> <5216FD0C.3090709@ti.com> <521702E2.5000102@ti.com> <521706D9.9070001@ti.com> <521719D8.7060506@ti.com> <521765DC.2000609@ti.com> <52178D98.8020202@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Nishanth Menon , Russell King - ARM Linux , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Tony Lindgren , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , Rajendra Nayak , Sekhar Nori , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Felipe Balbi , Grant Likely , Sricharan R , Thomas Gleixner , Linux-OMAP , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Friday 23 August 2013 03:06 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 8/23/2013 7:08 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >>> The whole point we are moving to domain is not have any default >>> mapping(connection done) at DT level. Rather DT only specifies the >>> peripherals and their cross-bar connection ID(i.e cross-bar IRQ line). >>> This will be the driver input as a IRQ line from DT. The cross-bar >>> driver needs to map any of the free list available on *request* only. >> >> Right, the mapping can be done on request. That will be cleaner. > > I like where this design is going now :-) > Sure and thanks for good discussion. Debates are useful regards, Santosh