From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Common Clock Framework support for Samsung S3C64xx Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 02:19:42 +0900 Message-ID: <521A3CAE.7020903@samsung.com> References: <1374536965-3545-1-git-send-email-tomasz.figa@gmail.com> <2956608.dyLtqySMuJ@amdc1227> <20130816210203.4443.43511@quantum> <3890424.fJfWX17mED@flatron> <158901ce9b34$c0ac8720$42059560$@org> <20130820002258.4443.34197@quantum> <18f101ce9d74$34e23450$9ea69cf0$@org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <18f101ce9d74$34e23450$9ea69cf0$@org> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: 'Mike Turquette' , 'Tomasz Figa' , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=27Heiko_St=FCbner=27?= , 'Arnd Bergmann' , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, 'Tomasz Figa' , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, 'Mark Brown' , stern@rowland.harvard.edu, 'Olof Johansson' , 'Thomas Abraham' , 'Sylwester Nawrocki' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/20/13 16:09, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Mike Turquette wrote: >> > > [...] > >>> OK, if new branch is ready, I will replace with that or if re-merge is >>> required, I will. Either way, I'm fine and can handle. Mike, let me know >>> your choice :-) >> >> Since I have already published it let's just go with the delta patch. I >> can create another stable branch named clk-next-s3c64xx-delta that just >> has this patch on top of clk-next-s3c64xx OR I can apply it on top of >> the existing clk-next-s3c64xx and re-merge it. >> > Sounds good to me. If the branch for the delta is ready, let me know. > Mike, I'm waiting for your delta branch which includes following from Tomasz. [PATCH] clk: samsung: pll: Use new registration method for PLL6552 and PLL6553 I couldn't send some branches to arm-soc for upcoming merge window yet because of build compilation breakage of common-clk-s3c64xx branch which has many dependencies... - Kukjin >> I'm trying to think on whether there are any weird git corner cases with >> re-merging clk-next-s3c64xx. Let me know if re-merging is somehow unsafe >> (makes history weird, or whatever). >> > I don't think it causes some problem. > >> Let me know what option is better for you. I'll publish as soon as I get >> the delta patch. Apologies again for creating some extra work! >> > No problem.