From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: at91: add support for generic pinconf
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 21:54:18 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521C22EA.1050908@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521BA235.1090104@overkiz.com>
On 08/26/2013 12:45 PM, boris brezillon wrote:
> Hello Jean-Christophe,
>
> Le 26/08/2013 19:53, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
>> On 23:37 Sat 24 Aug , Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>>> Add support for generic pin configuration to pinctrl-at91 driver.
...
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/atmel,at91-pinctrl.txt
...
>>> configures various pad settings
>>> such as pull-up, multi drive, etc.
>>> Required properties for iomux controller:
>>> -- compatible: "atmel,at91rm9200-pinctrl"
>>> +- compatible: "atmel,at91rm9200-pinctrl" or "atmel,at91sam9x5-pinctrl".
>>> + Add "generic-pinconf" to the compatible string list to use the
>>> generic pin
...
>>> +pinctrl@fffff400 {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>>> + ranges;
>>> + compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-pinctrl", "generic-pinconf",
>>> "simple-bus";
>> nack your break the backword compatibility
>>
>> if we use a old kernel with this new dt nothing will work
>> as the old kernel will never known the the "generic-pinconf" means
>> anything
>
> Your're right, I didn't think of this case (old kernel with new dt).
Well, just to be clear: If a new DT uses a new compatible value of any
kind, be it adding "generic-pinconf" or switching to "foo-yyy" rather
than "foo-yyy", it won't be compatible... That somewhat implies that you
can't ever replace an old binding with something new.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-27 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-24 21:32 [RFC PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: at91: add support for generic pinconf Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-24 21:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: add new generic pinconf config for deglitch filter Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-26 16:50 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-26 17:01 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-27 3:55 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-27 6:16 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-27 7:42 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-08-27 8:28 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-27 21:33 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-28 13:22 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-28 13:13 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-24 21:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: at91: add support for generic pinconf Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-26 16:53 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-26 17:17 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-27 3:57 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-27 6:40 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-27 21:35 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-26 17:53 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-08-26 18:45 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-26 19:18 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-08-26 19:48 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-27 7:51 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-08-27 3:54 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-08-27 6:04 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-27 21:30 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-24 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] ARM: at91/dt: move sama5 to " Boris BREZILLON
2013-08-28 12:28 ` Linus Walleij
2013-08-28 12:52 ` boris brezillon
2013-08-24 21:43 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: at91: add support for " boris brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521C22EA.1050908@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=richard.genoud@gmail.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=standby24x7@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).