From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/5] of: move of_parse_phandle() Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:09:55 -0600 Message-ID: <5220FC13.4070708@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1376515632-12594-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <1376515632-12594-2-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 08/28/2013 01:30 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> From: Stephen Warren >> >> Move of_parse_phandle() after __of_parse_phandle_with_args(), since a >> future patch will call __of_parse_phandle_with_args() from >> of_parse_phandle(). Moving the function avoids adding a prototype. Doing >> the move separately highlights the code changes separately. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren >> Acked-by: Mark Rutland >> --- >> v5: New patch. > > Still no feedback from Rob || Grant on this quite important cleanup? > > I would like to nominate Stephen Warren as co-maintainer of > drivers/of/*, he definately knows his way around the code. > I'm just worried that he may not accept due to a lot of work in the > bindings already. I would prefer not to be flooded with any more email. That said, /swapping/ my DT binding reviewer position with a drivers/of reviewer position would reduce the email load.