From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/19] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:56:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <522EFAD1.4020709@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130910024404.GC5815@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
On 10/09/13 03:44, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 04:24:18PM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>> Ok. But I am bit suspicious about devm_clk_get(cpu_dev, NULL).
>> I don't understand completely as how the clock are registered(whether
>> with dev_id or with connection_id).
>
> As the connection_id of devm_clk_get() call here is NULL, the clock
> lookup should be registered with a proper dev_id in clk_register_clkdev()
> call. And that's what you have seen with imx and shmobile code.
>
>
>> A quick grep revealed that i.mx and shmobile is using conection id while
>> registering.
>
> They are using dev_id.
>
Yes correct. I misunderstood, was expecting caller to pass dev and clk
layer extract dev_name so that even when device name is changed the clk
registration need not be changed.
>> If the clock is registered with connection id and retrieved
>> with cpu_dev(now dev_id is cpu0 and not cpufreq-cpu0), IIUC that would
>> break. If we pass pdev->dev for clk_get, it should be fine but again
>> IIUC it breaks highbank which gets all the information from DT.
>
> If the clock lookup is from DT, we should be just fine, since it will
> work as long as the DT node with 'clocks' property (/cpus/cpu@0 in this
> case) is attached to the struct device pointer of devm_clk_get() call.
>
This can be ignored if we are registering with "cpu0" as below in your
patch.
>> So only solution I can think of is to continue to have the code
>> assigning (&pdev->dev)->of_node with cpu device node which is not clean
>> and arguable as incorrect since there is no DT node for cpufreq-cpu0.
>> I don't have a strong opinion though.
>>
>> Let me know how would you like to fix this.
>
> So we only need to change all clkdev registration to use "cpu0" as
> dev_id intstead of "cpufreq-cpu0.0", something like below.
>
> And for imx, it should work even without the changes, because we have
> device tree lookup ready there, and those clk_register_clkdev() calls
> can just be removed now. But I prefer to include the change and leave
> the cleanup to another patch for keeping the change log clear.
>
Ok makes sense, do you want me to include this patch also as fix.
I can send a series to fix this if you OK:
1. Fix in cpufreq-cpu0
2. Fix in i.MX driver and platform file
3. Patch below
Regards,
Sudeep
>
> ---8<----------
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
> index c3cfa41..c6b40f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ int __init mx27_clocks_init(unsigned long fref)
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[ata_ahb_gate], "ata", NULL);
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[rtc_ipg_gate], NULL, "imx21-rtc");
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[scc_ipg_gate], "scc", NULL);
> - clk_register_clkdev(clk[cpu_div], NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0");
> + clk_register_clkdev(clk[cpu_div], NULL, "cpu0");
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[emi_ahb_gate], "emi_ahb" , NULL);
>
> mxc_timer_init(MX27_IO_ADDRESS(MX27_GPT1_BASE_ADDR), MX27_INT_GPT1);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c
> index 1a56a33..de1964c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx51-imx53.c
> @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static void __init mx5_clocks_common_init(unsigned long rate_ckil,
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi2_ipg_gate], NULL, "imx-ssi.1");
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[ssi3_ipg_gate], NULL, "imx-ssi.2");
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[sdma_gate], NULL, "imx35-sdma");
> - clk_register_clkdev(clk[cpu_podf], NULL, "cpufreq-cpu0.0");
> + clk_register_clkdev(clk[cpu_podf], NULL, "cpu0");
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[iim_gate], "iim", NULL);
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[dummy], NULL, "imx2-wdt.0");
> clk_register_clkdev(clk[dummy], NULL, "imx2-wdt.1");
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a73a4.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a73a4.c
> index 8ea5ef6..5bd2e85 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a73a4.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a73a4.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = {
> CLKDEV_CON_ID("pll2h", &pll2h_clk),
>
> /* CPU clock */
> - CLKDEV_DEV_ID("cpufreq-cpu0", &z_clk),
> + CLKDEV_DEV_ID("cpu0", &z_clk),
>
> /* DIV6 */
> CLKDEV_CON_ID("zb", &div6_clks[DIV6_ZB]),
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-sh73a0.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-sh73a0.c
> index 1942eae..c92c023 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-sh73a0.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-sh73a0.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = {
> CLKDEV_DEV_ID("smp_twd", &twd_clk), /* smp_twd */
>
> /* DIV4 clocks */
> - CLKDEV_DEV_ID("cpufreq-cpu0", &div4_clks[DIV4_Z]),
> + CLKDEV_DEV_ID("cpu0", &div4_clks[DIV4_Z]),
>
> /* DIV6 clocks */
> CLKDEV_CON_ID("vck1_clk", &div6_clks[DIV6_VCK1]),
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-10 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1374492747-13879-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
[not found] ` <1376991021-12160-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
[not found] ` <1376991021-12160-13-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
2013-09-06 13:44 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09 9:24 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09 14:32 ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-09 15:24 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10 2:44 ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10 10:56 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha [this message]
2013-09-10 11:19 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=522EFAD1.4020709@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jonas@southpole.se \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).