From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Cameron Subject: All device tree bindings need maintainer ack or just the 'interesting' ones. Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 13:07:30 +0100 Message-ID: <52345182.1080609@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Lee Jones List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi All, I'm getting a lot of IIO related device tree bindings at the moment. Most are pretty trivial e.g. http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=137881790217809&w=2 I know you are probably still working out how the device tree maintainership is going to work in the long run, but in the meantime do you want me to hold these on an Ack from one of the maintainers and/or to ensure that they are all posted to devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org? Really the question is do you want to be completely treated like any other subsystem, where, if a driver touches it, in how ever trivial a fashion, the assumption is it would be unwise to not attempt to get an Ack from the relevant maintainer. There are plenty of more 'interesting' IIO binding questions out there and obviously those need the input from the list and maintainers! In the meantime, we'll send everything to devicetree-u79uwXL29TaiAVqoAR/hOA@public.gmane.org Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html