From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PWM: PXA: add device tree support to PWM driver Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:45:31 -0600 Message-ID: <52375FDB.8090405@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1379091281-23662-1-git-send-email-mikedunn@newsguy.com> <201309151607.04244.marex@denx.de> <523718D3.4050003@newsguy.com> <201309161710.15800.marex@denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201309161710.15800.marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Marek Vasut Cc: Mike Dunn , linux-pwm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Grant Likely , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Dmitry Torokhov , Chao Xie , Sergei Shtylyov , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09/16/2013 09:10 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: ... > OK, to push it ad-absurdum, shall we not start listing every single revision of > the CPU as well? Like pxa250a0 250a1 etc ? Yes , this many-to-one mapping is It's not about CPU revisions, it's about revisions of the SoC that contain the IP block. > something I don't quite understand, that's why I'd love to see a good reasoning > from Stephen. Please see the earlier discussions. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html