From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC] gpio/omap: auto-setup a GPIO when used as an IRQ
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:54:54 +0200
Message-ID: <5241454E.2050602@collabora.co.uk>
References: <1379860848-29020-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20130923164519.GF2684@atomide.com> <524073BC.9080907@collabora.co.uk> <20130923170724.GG2684@atomide.com> <524141A6.2090701@ti.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <524141A6.2090701@ti.com>
Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Sricharan R <r.sricharan@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, Lars Poeschel <larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>, Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@gmail.com>, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>, Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>, Jon Hunter <jgchunter@gmail.com>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On 09/24/2013 09:39 AM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi,
> On Monday 23 September 2013 10:37 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> [130923 10:09]:
>>> On 09/23/2013 06:45 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> Hmm does this still work for legacy platform data based
>>>> drivers that are doing gpio_request() first?
>>>>
>>> Yes it still work when booting using board files. I tested on my OMAP3 board and
>>> it worked in both DT and legacy booting mode.
>> OK great.
>>  
>>>> And what's the path for clearing things for PM when free_irq()
>>>> gets called? It seems that this would leave the GPIO bank
>>>> enabled causing a PM regression?
>>>>
>>> Indeed, I did set bank->mod_usage |= 1 << offset so the bank is enabled if the
>>> device goes to suspended and then resumed but I completely forget about the
>>> clearing path when the IRQ is freed.
>>>
>>> Which makes me think that we should probably maintain two usage variables, one
>>> for GPIO and another one for IRQ and check both of them on the suspend/resume pm
>>> functions.
>> Yes that it seems that they should be treated separately.
>  To understand, why cant the flag be cleared in gpio_irq_shutdown ?

Hi Sricharan,

Without this patch today drivers do this:

gpio_request(gpio, "foo IRQ"); // bank->mod_usage |= 1 << offset
gpio_direction_input(gpio);

and then request a IRQ with:

irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
request_irq(irq, ...);

later on its cleanup path:

free_irq(irq, dev);
gpio_free(gpio) // bank->mod_usage &= ~(1 << offset);

So if you clear the flag on gpio_irq_shutdown then bank module won't be enabled
after a suspend making drivers using the GPIO after freeing the IRQ to fail.

So the idea is to have something like this:

a) Drivers that request both the GPIO and IRQ

gpio_request(gpio, "foo IRQ"); // bank->mod_usage |= 1 << offset
gpio_direction_input(gpio);

irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
request_irq(irq, ...); // bank->irq_usage |= 1 << offset

free_irq(irq, dev); // bank->irq_usage &= ~(1 << offset);
gpio_free(gpio) // bank->mod_usage &= ~(1 << offset);

b) Drivers that just request the IRQ:

irq = gpio_to_irq(gpio);
request_irq(irq, ...); // bank->irq_usage |= 1 << offset
free_irq(irq, dev); // bank->irq_usage &= ~(1 << offset);

So irq_usage or mod_usage is set means that the bank has to be enabled and if
both are not set means that the bank module can be disabled.

> 
> Regards,
>  Sricharan
> 

Best regards,
Javier