Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM DT cpus/cpu and topology bindings

From: Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre
	<nicolas.pitre-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Vincent Guittot
	<vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt
	<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Ian Campbell
	<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	"rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org"
	<rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Gregory Clement
	<gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
	Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM DT cpus/cpu and topology bindings
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:50:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5242EA2E.1010106@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130924160126.GC403-7AyDDHkRsp3ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>

On 09/24/2013 11:01 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> [replying to self]
> 
> Any further comments on this series ? If not, I think bindings are ready to be
> queued, but for that I need acks from DT maintainers.

Who do you plan to take this? Is this dependent on something for 3.13?
If not, I'll apply it.

Rob

> The issue with in kernel dts that (re)-need patching owing to re-introduction
> of reg property on pre-v7 UP is still pending.
> 
> Please advise, thank you very much,
> Lorenzo
> 
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:21:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> This is v2 of a previous posting:
>>
>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-August/192322.html
>>
>> - v2 changes
>> 	- Removed single core cpu-map example
>> 	- Removed OS dependency from cpus/cpu bindings
>> 	- Updated Marvell compatible strings
>> 	- Clarified behaviour on pre ARM v7 uniprocessor systems and updated
>> 	  examples
>>
>> This patch resumes DT topology/cpu bindings discussions for ARM that were
>> started here:
>>
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-April/031725.html
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/devicetree-discuss/2013-April/032450.html
>>
>> Comments welcome, thanks,
>> Lorenzo
>>
>> Lorenzo Pieralisi (2):
>>   Documentation: devicetree: arm: cpus/cpu nodes bindings updates
>>   Documentation: DT: arm: define CPU topology bindings
>>
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cpus.txt     | 391 +++++++++++++++--
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt | 474 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 818 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/topology.txt
>>
>> -- 
>> 1.8.2.2
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html