From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrzej Hajda Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] clk/exynos convert clock IDs to macros Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:21:52 +0200 Message-ID: <524426E0.7020006@samsung.com> References: <1378462361-13680-1-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com> <8412301.YP2zzplWoe@amdc1227> <070001ceafa5$d4d81a40$7e884ec0$%kim@samsung.com> <523716C9.3000204@samsung.com> <20130916193709.27384.86101@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20130916193709.27384.86101@quantum> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: Mike Turquette , Sylwester Nawrocki , 'Tomasz Figa' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Kyungmin Park' , devicetree , linux-samsung-soc List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09/16/2013 09:37 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2013-09-16 07:33:45) >> On 09/12/2013 12:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>> Well...I'm not sure changing to use macro is better or not at this moment... >> I think it is. ;) It's really less error prone to have symbolic names instead >> of the plain numbers. The clock ids are defined in one place and it is more >> clear what a clock is by looking at symbolic name. It's especially annoying >> to use plain numbers where are are many clock in a single node, like 10 or >> more. What are you main concerns with this ? > I think having the symbolic names is a win for readability. > > Regards, > Mike > >> -- >> Regards, >> Sylwester Hi Kukjin, Any thoughts/decisions regarding this patchset ? Regards Andrzej