From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: generic: Add generic DT based simple codec Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:16:11 -0600 Message-ID: <5244C03B.6060806@wwwdotorg.org> References: <20130919105437.75e0f0a3@armhf> <5240B07C.6080404@wwwdotorg.org> <20130923232648.GL21013@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130923232648.GL21013-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Jean-Francois Moine , Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09/23/2013 05:26 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 03:19:56PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 09/19/2013 02:54 AM, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > >>> +Required properties: +- compatible: should be >>> "linux,simple-codec". > >> We shouldn't have any Linux-specific bindings. It might be >> reasonable to define a binding for a "simple CODEC", but there's >> no reason it should be Linux-specific. > > What's the vendor prefix to use then? The same thought did occur > to me but I wasn't sure what to suggest instead. For other non-vendor-specific/generic bindings, we've simply omitted the vendor prefix from the compatible value, e.g.: gpio-keys, i2c-gpio, regulator-fixed, etc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html