Re: [PATCH 0/2] move of_find_next_cache_node to DT core

[Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>]

Hi Grant,

On 18/09/13 17:18, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> On 18/09/13 15:51, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The cache bindings are generic and used by many other architectures
>>> apart from PPC. These patches fixes and move the existing definition
>>> of of_find_next_cache_node to DT common code.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sudeep
>>
>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> However, do you have a user for this function on other architectures
>> yet? I'd like to see a user for the function in the same patch series..
>>
> 
> Yes I have posted an RFC[1] following this series implementing cacheinfo
> for ARM similar to x86 implementation. I was not sure if it's good idea
> to combine it as its still initial RFC version.
> 

Do you prefer to have this a independent change or to go with the cache topology
support patches[1] on ARM ?

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html