From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org"
<kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH|RFC] of: let of_match_device() always return best match
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 19:57:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525052F5.5080204@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5BekS_BvJzrt8vM1=7LjsiO=3hKL=mMfTjxkO3aZ4qwRQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2667 bytes --]
On 10/05/2013 07:46 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> For example:
>>
>> The imx28.dtsi gives this compatible string for its CAN core:
>>
>>> compatible = "fsl,imx28-flexcan", "fsl,p1010-flexcan";
>>
>> The flexcan driver defines:
>>
>>> static const struct of_device_id flexcan_of_match[] = {
>>> { .compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan", .data = &fsl_p1010_devtype_data, },
>>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx28-flexcan", .data = &fsl_imx28_devtype_data, },
>>> { .compatible = "fsl,imx6q-flexcan", .data = &fsl_imx6q_devtype_data, },
>>> { /* sentinel */ },
>>> };
>>
>> The "p1010" was the first Freescale SoC with the flexcan core. But this SoC has
>> a bug, so a workaround has to be enabled in the driver. The mx28 has this bug
>> fixed, so we don't need this quite costly workaround.
>
> What about defining in imx28.dtsi:
> compatible = "fsl,imx28-flexcan".
It already works with changing only the driver.
> and the in the flexcan driver we could do the same as in the fec_main driver:
>
> static struct platform_device_id fec_devtype[] = {
For DT based probing I need to modify the struct of_device_id, but I got
the idea :)
> {
> /* keep it for coldfire */
> .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> .driver_data = 0,
> }, {
> .name = "imx25-fec",
> .driver_data = FEC_QUIRK_USE_GASKET,
> }, {
> .name = "imx27-fec",
> .driver_data = 0,
> }, {
> .name = "imx28-fec",
> .driver_data = FEC_QUIRK_ENET_MAC | FEC_QUIRK_SWAP_FRAME,
> }, {
> .name = "imx6q-fec",
> .driver_data = FEC_QUIRK_ENET_MAC | FEC_QUIRK_HAS_GBIT |
> FEC_QUIRK_HAS_BUFDESC_EX | FEC_QUIRK_HAS_CSUM |
> FEC_QUIRK_HAS_VLAN | FEC_QUIRK_ERR006358,
> }, {
> .name = "mvf600-fec",
> .driver_data = FEC_QUIRK_ENET_MAC,
> }, {
> /* sentinel */
> }
> };
>
> So that we know which SoC needs to have the workaround applied or not.
I've already created a patch that rearranges the struct of_device_id in
the driver, works for me. I posted it (with another fix) for review on
linux-can[1].
Thanks,
Marc
[1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.can/4050
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 259 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-05 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-03 18:51 [PATCH|RFC] of: let of_match_device() always return best match Marc Kleine-Budde
[not found] ` <1380826284-18381-1-git-send-email-mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-03 20:37 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <524DD5A6.6020204-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-03 21:51 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
[not found] ` <524DE6DB.1070003-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-03 22:23 ` Rob Herring
2013-10-05 17:46 ` Fabio Estevam
[not found] ` <CAOMZO5BekS_BvJzrt8vM1=7LjsiO=3hKL=mMfTjxkO3aZ4qwRQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-05 17:57 ` Marc Kleine-Budde [this message]
[not found] ` <525052F5.5080204-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-07 8:17 ` Lothar Waßmann
[not found] ` <21074.28159.130293.169699-VjFSrY7JcPWvSplVBqRQBQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-07 8:18 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525052F5.5080204@pengutronix.de \
--to=mkl-bicnvbalz9megne8c9+irq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=festevam-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).