From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Quadros Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/10] usb: dwc3: omap: manage "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" clock Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 11:19:32 +0300 Message-ID: <52526E94.7080605@ti.com> References: <1379508542-22389-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1379508542-22389-10-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <52403E02.4070208@ti.com> <20131002131113.GM1476@radagast> <524C22A1.30200@ti.com> <20131003122941.GD3230@radagast> <524D8516.8000107@ti.com> <20131003154144.GA18189@kroah.com> <524E9C70.8050303@ti.com> <20131004132329.GA25648@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131004132329.GA25648@kroah.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg KH Cc: balbi@ti.com, bcousson@baylibre.com, tony@atomide.com, george.cherian@ti.com, kishon@ti.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, thomas.langer@lantiq.com, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/04/2013 04:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:46:08PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Greg, >> >> On 10/03/2013 06:41 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 05:54:14PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> On 10/03/2013 03:29 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:41:53PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>>>> On 10/02/2013 04:11 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:11:30PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Felipe, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 09/18/2013 03:49 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>>>>>>> "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is an optional functional clock to the >>>>>>>>> UBS_OTG_SS module. So manage it in the driver. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just realized that "usb_otg_ss_refclk960m" is in fact functional clock to the >>>>>>>> PHY and not USB_OTG_SS module. The name is misleading. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So please ignore patch 9 and 10. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ignored. All others are fine, right ? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. But I might have to rebase this on top of Phy framework stuff. >>>>> >>>>> alright, Greg already took the PHY framework, so maybe we need to just >>>>> give him my Acked-by and he takes the patches directly as I don't have >>>>> PYH framework. >>>>> >>>> OK. I'll resend this series to Greg in a while. >>> >>> It looks like you did, but forgot Felipe's ack :( >>> >> I was under the impression that Felipe will explicitly give his Ack there. >> Should I resend with his Acked-bys? > > No need, I took the patches yesterday, you should have seen the > automated emails, right? > Thanks. Yes, I got the automated e-mails. cheers, -roger