From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:55:41 +0530
Message-ID: <5257B605.2000608@ti.com>
References: <1381408647-24653-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <5256A773.6060807@nvidia.com> <5257977C.1030108@ti.com> <5257A36D.80902@samsung.com> <5257AE43.4020902@ti.com> <5257B576.3060800@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <5257B576.3060800@samsung.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>, "rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>, "pawel.moll@arm.com" <pawel.moll@arm.com>, "mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>, "swarren@wwwdotorg.org" <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>, "ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, "rob@landley.net" <rob@landley.net>, "myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>, "gg@slimlogic.co.uk" <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Friday 11 October 2013 01:53 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 10/11/2013 04:52 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>
>> On Friday 11 October 2013 12:36 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> On 10/11/2013 03:15 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:41 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>>> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:07 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>>>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a
>>>>>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible
>>>>>> types for backward compatibility.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I dont have much issue on this nomenclature but just second thought:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Palmas USB module is capable of detection VBUS, ID-GND, ID-RA, ID-RB, ID-RC
>>>>> and ID-FLOAT as per BC1.2.
>>>>> This sub-module only detect the cable, does nothing more than this.
>>>>> In this case, should we say "ti,palmas-usb-extcon"?
>>>>> Again extcon is linux specific terminology and this can be defer.
>>>>
>>>> I don't mind either way. Chanwoo?
>>>
>>> The EXTCON is subsystem name. I don't prefer to use 'extcon' word on device name.
>>> I agree Kishon opinion.
>>
>> Cool.. can you this patch as-is?
>>
> 
> OK, applied it.

Thanks :-)

-Kishon