From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/19] clk: tegra: simplify periph clock data Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:46:21 -0600 Message-ID: <525D8D7D.10301@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1381848794-11761-1-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> <1381848794-11761-3-git-send-email-pdeschrijver@nvidia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1381848794-11761-3-git-send-email-pdeschrijver-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Peter De Schrijver Cc: Prashant Gaikwad , Mike Turquette , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Hiroshi Doyu , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/15/2013 08:52 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > This patch determines the register bank for clock enable/disable and reset > based on the clock ID instead of hardcoding it in the tables describing the > clocks. This results in less data to be maintained in the tables, making the > code easier to understand. The full benefit of the change will be realized once > also other clocktypes will be table based. > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c > #define TEGRA_INIT_DATA_MUX(_name, _con_id, _dev_id, _parents, _offset, \ > - _clk_num, _regs, _gate_flags, _clk_id) \ > + _clk_num, _gate_flags, _clk_id) \ > TEGRA_INIT_DATA_TABLE(_name, _con_id, _dev_id, _parents, _offset,\ > - 30, MASK(2), 0, 0, 8, 1, 0, _regs, _clk_num, \ > - periph_clk_enb_refcnt, _gate_flags, _clk_id, \ > - _parents##_idx, 0) > + 30, MASK(2), 0, 0, 8, 1, 0, \ > + _clk_num, periph_clk_enb_refcnt, _gate_flags,\ > + _clk_id, _parents##_idx, 0) Nit (since there are bugs since I know V4 is needed): If you kept _clk_num on the same line in that macro, the diff would be much more obvious. I think I said this last time. > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra_periph_clk_list); i++) { > data = &tegra_periph_clk_list[i]; > - clk = tegra_clk_register_periph(data->name, data->parent_names, > - data->num_parents, &data->periph, > - clk_base, data->offset, data->flags); > + > + clk = tegra_clk_register_periph(data->name, > + data->parent_names, data->num_parents, &data->periph, > + clk_base, data->offset, data->flags); > clks[data->clk_id] = clk; > } > > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra_periph_nodiv_clk_list); i++) { > data = &tegra_periph_nodiv_clk_list[i]; > + > clk = tegra_clk_register_periph_nodiv(data->name, Nit: Seems like an unrelated change, and inconsistent with the other loop above. > diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk.c > +struct tegra_clk_periph_regs * __init get_reg_bank(int clkid) > +{ > + int reg_bank = clkid / 32; > + > + if (reg_bank < periph_banks) > + return &periph_regs[reg_bank]; > + else { > + WARN_ON(1); > + return NULL; > + } > +} > + > +int __init tegra_clk_periph_banks(int num) > +{ > + if (num > ARRAY_SIZE(periph_regs)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + periph_banks = num; > + > + return 0; > +} Shouldn't the condition in tegra_clk_periph_banks() check against periph_banks rather than ARRAY_SIZE(periph_regs)? I assume the calls to tegra_clk_periph_banks() from tegra*_clock_init() are intended to ensure that periph_regs is set up correctly in this file? I wonder if s/tegra_clk_periph_banks/tegra_clk_validate_periph_bank_count/ isn't called for? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html