From: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: dinguyen@altera.com, Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv2 1/3] arm: socfpga: Set the SDMMC clock phase in system manager
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:21:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525DA3BE.2030304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201310152147.27569.arnd@arndb.de>
On 10/15/13 2:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 October 2013, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>> 1 Create a "syscon" backend driver to control your "system manager", which
>>> lets other drivers hook into it without calling a private API.
>> Yes, if you look at drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-socfpga.c that is in the
>> mainline,
>> it is hooking into the "system manager" through "syscon". Is this what you
>> mean here?
> No, because you directly hook into the syscon driver, rather than using
> a clock driver as the middle-man, see steps 2 and 3 below.
>
Ok, now I understand.
>> The problem is because of the SYSMGR_SDMMCGRP_CTRL_OFFSET define
>> in this file. This means the SD/MMC driver needs information that is
>> outside of its IP.
> Yes, this is not ideal because you don't really want that information
> in the sd/mmc driver. That driver should only know about the fact
> that it talks to a clock controller, not how it's implemented.
>
> Arnd
>
>>> 2 Create a trivial clock driver that is independent of your existing
>>> clock driver and independent of the other drivers using the system
>>> manager, by using syscon as the low-level interface.
>>> 3 Make the sdmmc driver use the normal clock API and link its clock to the
>>> driver from step 2 in the device tree.
This makes sense for the SD/MMC driver, but do you think I can use the
same approach for
other drivers that this system manager touches? i.e. The ethernet IP's
PHY setting is controlled
by a register that is in the system manager as well.
I have submitted this patch for enabling ethernet. It is making use of
the driver platform specific
driver calls to touch the system manager.
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-September/200173.html
Just wondering if that is right approach for the ethernet driver? If
not, then I think I may have
to come up with a generic system manager driver so that it can be used
for other IPs.
Thanks,
Dinh
>>>
>>> Is this what you have tried before?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-14 19:47 [RESEND PATCHv2 1/3] arm: socfpga: Set the SDMMC clock phase in system manager dinguyen
[not found] ` <1381780051-1826-1-git-send-email-dinguyen-EIB2kfCEclfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-14 19:47 ` [RESEND PATCHv2 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc-socfpga: Clean up SOCFPGA platform specific functionality dinguyen-EIB2kfCEclfQT0dZR+AlfA
2013-10-14 19:47 ` [RESEND PATCHv2 3/3] arm: dts: socfpga: Add support for SD/MMC dinguyen
2013-10-15 6:51 ` [RESEND PATCHv2 1/3] arm: socfpga: Set the SDMMC clock phase in system manager Jaehoon Chung
2013-10-15 12:37 ` Dinh Nguyen
2013-10-15 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-10-15 13:22 ` Dinh Nguyen
2013-10-15 19:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-10-15 19:19 ` Dinh Nguyen
2013-10-15 19:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-10-15 20:21 ` Dinh Nguyen [this message]
2013-10-16 18:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525DA3BE.2030304@gmail.com \
--to=dinh.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dinguyen@altera.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pavel@denx.de \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).