From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PM / OPP: updates to enable sharing OPPs info Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:26:50 +0100 Message-ID: <52601DDA.1020105@arm.com> References: <1380634382-15609-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <3220965.oF35vmiThF@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3220965.oF35vmiThF@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, On 17/10/13 00:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, October 01, 2013 02:32:57 PM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha >> >> Hi, >> >> These are few updates to existing device tree binding and the PM/OPP >> library to support sharing of OPPs between different device nodes. >> >> Currently all the cpu nodes are parsed until the OPPs are found. This >> is essential to support cpuhotplug without having to replicate OPP >> information in all the cpu nodes. >> >> However in systems with multiple cpu power domain, its better to have >> OPP entry for each cpu. To avoid replication, phandle can be specified >> to the node which contains the full OPP information. >> >> The table node containing all the OPPs and device nodes pointing to an >> entry into it through phandle might also solve the problem of describing >> multiple OPP profiles. > > It looks like this still is under discussion, isn't it? > > If not, care to obtain ACKs from the people involved and resubmit? > Thanks for following up on this patches. Since the entire series is based on the DT binding in PATCH 1, which is still in discussion and subject to change, I don't think its ready yet. Regards, Sudeep