From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: fix iteration bug over CPU reg properties
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:38:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52652042.4090200@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380904802-10432-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org>
Hi Grant,
On 04/10/13 17:40, Grant Likely wrote:
> The size of each hwid in a cpu nodes 'reg' property is defined by the
> parents #address-cells property in the normal way. The cpu parsing code
> has a bug where it will overrun the end of the property if
> address-cells is greater than one. This commit fixes the problem by
> adjusting the array size by the number of address cells. It also makes
> sure address-cells isn't zero for that would cause an infinite loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> I discovered this during code inspection. I don't think it is an actual
> bug seen in the wild, but the code does look wrong. I'd appreciate
> someone take a look and confirm that I've read the code right.
>
Thanks for finding and fixing the bug.
I have tested this on ARM64 with 2 cell reg value using [1].
Tested-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Regards,
Sudeep
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-October/206401.html
> drivers/of/base.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index e4c9945..470b871 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -263,11 +263,11 @@ static bool __of_find_n_match_cpu_property(struct device_node *cpun,
> int ac, prop_len, tid;
> u64 hwid;
>
> - ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpun);
> + ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpun) ? : OF_ROOT_NODE_ADDR_CELLS_DEFAULT;
> cell = of_get_property(cpun, prop_name, &prop_len);
> if (!cell)
> return false;
> - prop_len /= sizeof(*cell);
> + prop_len /= sizeof(*cell) * ac;
> for (tid = 0; tid < prop_len; tid++) {
> hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac);
> if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid)) {
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-21 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-04 16:40 [PATCH] of: fix iteration bug over CPU reg properties Grant Likely
2013-10-21 12:38 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52652042.4090200@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).