From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] ARM topic: Is DT on ARM the solution, or is there something better? Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 21:24:20 +0100 Message-ID: <52658D74.3010504@wwwdotorg.org> References: <52644A9E.3060007@wwwdotorg.org> <20131020220839.GT2443@sirena.org.uk> <5264576F.6050307@wwwdotorg.org> <20131021091555.GB21518@ulmo.nvidia.com> <20131021170711.GA5256@netboy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131021170711.GA5256@netboy> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Richard Cochran , Thierry Reding Cc: Nicolas Pitre , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "ksummit-2013-discuss-cunTk1MwBs98uUxBSJOaYoYkZiVZrdSR2LY78lusg7I@public.gmane.org" , Mark Brown , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/21/2013 06:07 PM, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:15:56AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: >> >> Right now, we're taking away much of that flexibility and I see progress >> on ARM actively hindered. > > Baloney. > > No one is taking away your flexibility or hindering progress. It is > really very simple. Just make an arm-dt-devel tree where you can both > change the bindings at will and recommend to people. Once bindings > have seen some real world testing and have had time to mature, then > request a merge into mainline. Thierry already has working patches for LCD support, and the "request [for] a merge into mainline" is just "send the patch to be applied to mainline", which he did, and was blocked on, because of the potential existance of CDF if the future. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html