From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrzej Hajda Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] clk/exynos convert clock IDs to macros Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:31:47 +0100 Message-ID: <526E7553.8030607@samsung.com> References: <1378462361-13680-1-git-send-email-a.hajda@samsung.com> <8412301.YP2zzplWoe@amdc1227> <070001ceafa5$d4d81a40$7e884ec0$%kim@samsung.com> <523716C9.3000204@samsung.com> <20130916193709.27384.86101@quantum> <06c101cebdc5$75a83d10$60f8b730$%kim@samsung.com> <20131002010953.9338.23436@quantum> <0d8901cec170$f7230b50$e56921f0$%kim@samsung.com> <20131006202709.32214.75572@quantum> <525274FA.5020701@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <525274FA.5020701@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim Cc: Mike Turquette , 'Sylwester Nawrocki' , 'Tomasz Figa' , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Kyungmin Park' , 'devicetree' , 'linux-samsung-soc' List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Ping Regards Andrzej On 10/07/2013 10:46 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 10/06/2013 10:27 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: >> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-10-04 19:16:56) >>> Mike Turquette wrote: >>>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-09-30 03:11:41) >>>>> Mike Turquette wrote: >>>>>> Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2013-09-16 07:33:45) >>>>>>> On 09/12/2013 12:50 PM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>>>>>> Well...I'm not sure changing to use macro is better or not at this >>>>>> moment... >>>>>>> I think it is. ;) It's really less error prone to have symbolic >>>> names >>>>>> instead >>>>>>> of the plain numbers. The clock ids are defined in one place and it >>>> is >>>>>> more >>>>>>> clear what a clock is by looking at symbolic name. It's especially >>>>>> annoying >>>>>>> to use plain numbers where are are many clock in a single node, like >>>> 10 >>>>>> or >>>>>>> more. What are you main concerns with this ? >>>>>> I think having the symbolic names is a win for readability. >>>>>> >>>>> Hmm...since Mike who is a maintainer for ccf agrees with Sylwester's >>>> opinion, so I agree. Actually, I had no strong objection on this but still >>>> I'm not sure using macro is really better because sometimes the name >>>> doesn't give readability really I think though. >>>>> Mike, can you give me your ack on clk stuff? >>>> Yes, but I was thinking to take this change through the clk tree. The >>>> new branch based on -rc3 will be published tonight. >>>> >>>> Let me know if it causes problems for you for me to take it. >>>> >>> Uhm, I think dt changes can make ugly conflicts because of spread dt changing? >> Sure, go ahead and take the patches then. >> >> Acked-by: Mike Turquette >> >> Regards, >> Mike > > I can create patchset based on different git branch if neccessary. > > Regards > Andrzej >>> - Kukjin >