From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of: move definition of of_find_next_cache_node into common code. Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 10:32:58 +0000 Message-ID: <527231DA.9060002@arm.com> References: <1379501585-12532-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <1379501585-12532-3-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> <1383196834.28909.7.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1383196834.28909.7.camel@pasglop> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org" , "grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, On 31/10/13 05:20, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 11:53 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote: >> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha >> >> Since the definition of_find_next_cache_node is architecture independent, >> the existing definition in powerpc can be moved to driver/of/base.c >> >> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt >> Cc: Grant Likely >> Cc: Rob Herring >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha > > I've seen no follow up on that, I'm happy to stick it in powerpc-next > with some other late stuff. > Thanks for the follow up. Grant wanted to see usage of this outside PPC and I pointed him[0] to the RFC[1] I had posted to support cacheinfo on ARM. These patches are based on v3.12-rc1, let me know if you want me to rebase/repost on any particular version. Regards, Sudeep [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg05174.html [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html