From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nishanth Menon Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 07/43] CLK: TI: add autoidle support Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 08:59:07 -0600 Message-ID: <5277B63B.7080106@ti.com> References: <1382716658-6964-1-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <1382716658-6964-8-git-send-email-t-kristo@ti.com> <52727FDA.7060009@ti.com> <527371F5.9080702@ti.com> <5273FDF1.6090405@ti.com> <52777042.40703@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52777042.40703@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tero Kristo , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com, tony@atomide.com, bcousson@baylibre.com, rnayak@ti.com, mturquette@linaro.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/04/2013 04:00 AM, Tero Kristo wrote: > On 11/01/2013 09:16 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> On 11/01/2013 04:18 AM, Tero Kristo wrote: [...] >> one other thing I missed, will be nice to introduce a common bindings >> for autoidle which tends to be reused in other drivers.. > > You mean documentation or? Autoidle from this patch is only used by two > clock drivers (divider + fixed-factor.) DPLLs use completely different > setup. Converting the interface clocks to use the same might be rather > nasty thing to do. The definitions are common - so, yes, it will be nice to have autoidle.txt which is then pointed to by divider, fixed-clock etc.. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon