From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] devicetree: bindings: Document Qualcomm cpus and enable-method Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 09:46:30 -0800 Message-ID: <52792EF6.2040005@codeaurora.org> References: <1383343739-23080-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1383343739-23080-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20131104173606.GL21983@codeaurora.org> <378446F7-DC51-448D-AF99-93F98CEAFB03@codeaurora.org> <52792C60.2030405@codeaurora.org> <1A27B0E2-FB92-488D-A0B3-65E677525720@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1A27B0E2-FB92-488D-A0B3-65E677525720@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kumar Gala Cc: Rob Herring , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-arm-msm , David Brown , Rohit Vaswani , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/05/13 09:43, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Nov 5, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >> On 11/05/13 09:12, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> I think this should be more specific than just 'qcom,mmio' or 'qcom,warm-boot'. It should be 'qcom,kpss-acc-v1' or 'qcom-gcc-8660'. >>> >> Do you have any reasons why? I don't see why we need to keep adding more >> and more enable-methods every time the subsystem surrounding the CPU >> changes. The method is the same, write some registers to power up the >> CPU for the first time (cold boot) or ping the CPU to wake it up >> (warmboot). The only difference is where those registers live and a >> slight variation in the sequence that we perform. > By that argument every device could just be compatible with 'mmio' and be done with it ;) > > As the registers you write vary, the compatible should vary. The compatible does vary. The enable-method is not a compatible property. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation